Welcome to HandloadersBench.com. You will receive a activation email with a link in it to activate your account. If you don't receive the email check your spam or junk folders. Email servers look at our email as spam. Our mission here is to provide a place for those interested in the hobby of Reloading Ammunition. We offer a series of forums where they can ask questions, share answers, and highlight successes & failures so that others can learn. If you join our site please be aware that front porch rules apply. If you wouldn't say it on your front porch with grandma, your pastor and your 12 year old niece present it doesn't belong here. The Golden Rule applies. If you can live within those guidelines, Welcome Aboard!
Spammers, trolls, and flamers will not last long here, your time would be better spent looking for a board where those traits are acceptable. HB Administration
Thecyberguy wrote: Why would they list it for all the way to a 200gr in the 308 and stop at 107 in the 260?
They don not even list it in the annual for 243???
Cyberguy, two things come to mind.
They haven't gotten there yet, a fair possibility.
The expansion ratio for the .308 is nothing like the .260. A more likely bet. It seems as new powders are developed, they are for narrower and narrower applications. Powders suitable for the .243 (6mm-08), are useful in the .260 (6.5mm-08), but rarely tops in a 7mm-08. By the time you hit the .308, the requirements are quite different.
____________________ Experience is what you get, when you don't get what you want ;-)