The Handloaders Bench Home
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

Attention: Due to an increase in spammers all new members will be activated manually by an administrator, and start out as probationary members. You will only be able to start a welcome post in the welcome new members forum. You can reply to all other posts. Once you have reached 5 posts you will be a full member and can start topics. We apologize for the inconvenience but spammers are becoming a real problem. We are also experiencing problems with new members receiving activation emails. We are manually activating new members. Please be patient with us. We will activate your membership within 24 hours of registration. We are sorry for any inconvenience this might cause. HB Admin

300 Blackout 1:7 vs. 1:8
 Moderated by: Slingshot, Rockydog, klallen, DesertMarine, -6
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu Jan 3rd, 2013 06:06 PM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
1st Post
zMot
Full Member


Joined: Wed Mar 14th, 2012
Location: PORTLAND, Oregon USA
Posts: 59
Photo: [Download]
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: 9mm, .38 Super, .40 S&W, 41 Mag, .45 ACP, .223 ...
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I'm ready to make this jump, but wanted to see if anyone here would like to have a technical discussion on the pro/con aspect of the barrel twist.
The plan is to build one, with a barrel length between 10.x" & 12.x", with and without a suppressor, of course. Will one twist stabilize & function both better than the other? Accuracy of both suppressed & unsuppressed is the objective.

thanks for your thoughts in advance
zMot



 Posted: Thu Jan 3rd, 2013 10:35 PM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
2nd Post
SavageShooter
Forum Benefactor


Joined: Mon Feb 15th, 2010
Location: Suburb Of KC, Missouri USA
Posts: 4698
Photo: [Download]
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: rifle
My favorite chambering is:: Improved Chamberings
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Not really a huge spread on twist rates for the 300 AAC, I think 1:7 through 1:8.5 is about all you can get. Regardless, both with shoot supers and subs just fine. I think if it were me, and I was building an SBR, I'd get the faster twist barrel. Just my 2 cents.



____________________
"Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities."


 Posted: Thu Jan 3rd, 2013 10:53 PM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
3rd Post
zMot
Full Member


Joined: Wed Mar 14th, 2012
Location: PORTLAND, Oregon USA
Posts: 59
Photo: [Download]
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: 9mm, .38 Super, .40 S&W, 41 Mag, .45 ACP, .223 ...
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Thanks Savage, I was leaning that way. WIll probably go there unless someone can show a definite difference otherwise.



 Posted: Sat Jan 19th, 2013 07:46 AM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
4th Post
shodan
Full Member


Joined: Sun Mar 27th, 2011
Location: Kent, Washington USA
Posts: 263
Photo: 
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: 10mm
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What purpose are you getting the 300 for? I am not as familiar with the 300 black out as some others, but with the option for having sub sonic rounds as well as supersonic rounds, are the manufacturers of this ammo reducing the velocity of the bullets by utilizing bullet weight, or charge strength? The twists of 7 and 8 are so close, there wouldn't really be any noticeable difference between the two, unless there was some kind of extreme involved... like shooting a super heavy weight bullet for the caliber real slowly, or shooting a super light for caliber bullet at a much higher speed. With those you would run the risk of having your bullet not stabilize, or having it disintegrate because of the twist being so fast, respectively.



 Posted: Sat Jan 19th, 2013 12:25 PM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
5th Post
Reloader George
Forum Benefactor


Joined: Fri Mar 30th, 2012
Location: Moncks Corner, South Carolina USA
Posts: 85
Photo: [Download]
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: .357 Mag, .357 Max
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

The 1 in 7 twist is needed to stabilize the 240 grain bullets.  The 220 is tops otherwise.



____________________
Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.




 Posted: Sat Jan 19th, 2013 02:33 PM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
6th Post
shodan
Full Member


Joined: Sun Mar 27th, 2011
Location: Kent, Washington USA
Posts: 263
Photo: 
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: 10mm
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Thats what I was thinking of for the faster twist, but I don't know really how the cartridge is loaded, so a 7 twist is good for the 240 grain bullet, but is this cartridge being loaded fast with a bullet that's light like a 110 grain bullet? If you were to propel that weight bullet fast enough you could get into some integrity issues with the bullet jacket.

Other than that, I personally would always favor the faster twist.



 Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 11:57 AM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
7th Post
snoshu
Junior Member
 

Joined: Thu Jan 17th, 2013
Location:  
Posts: 14
Photo: 
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: rifle
My favorite chambering is:: 300 weatherby ...
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Thats awesome I wish I had the knowledge and experience to do a project like that myself



 Posted: Thu Jan 24th, 2013 04:01 PM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
8th Post
zMot
Full Member


Joined: Wed Mar 14th, 2012
Location: PORTLAND, Oregon USA
Posts: 59
Photo: [Download]
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: 9mm, .38 Super, .40 S&W, 41 Mag, .45 ACP, .223 ...
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Thanks for the responses & comments folks.
The intent of this rifle build is to make a Close Quarter Battle Rifle of my own, that will provide a platform for two handguard designs I've been working on for about 9 months. I'll share the results when I've completed the projects.
Thanks Again\z



 Current time is 01:14 AM
Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1653 seconds (9% database + 91% PHP). 26 queries executed.