The Handloaders Bench Home
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
The Handloaders Bench > Metallic cartridge reloading > Learning to Handload? > Measuring variation in overall all length

Measuring variation in overall all length
 Moderated by: Timberghozt
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 12:13 AM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
1st Post
TnTom
member


Joined: Sat Oct 24th, 2009
Location: Woodbury, Tennessee USA
Posts: 72
Photo: 
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: none
My favorite chambering is:: any
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What method do you use and do you measure from base to tip or base the tangent pt of the body.
When do you trim the meplat? At what point does it become necessary and when would it be considered excessive.



____________________
Don't accept the promise of security as a substitute for freedom.


 Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 12:33 AM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
2nd Post
StretchNM
member


Joined: Sat Jan 10th, 2009
Location: Alamogordo, New Mexico USA
Posts: 122
Photo: [Download]
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: big bore dangerous game
My favorite chambering is:: 25-06
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I measure from base to tip. There are always slight variations in the measurement, from .001" to about .003", or so, because bullet tips can be damaged or slightly off.

I never trim the meplat, although I have filed it gently to correct (to some degree) a damaged bullet tip.



____________________
DON'T BE SCARED
-Stretch


 Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 12:34 AM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
3rd Post
OldStuffer
member


Joined: Sat Oct 31st, 2009
Location: Newton, Kansas USA
Posts: 234
Photo: 
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: I load everything!
My favorite chambering is:: 12-gauge A-5, .308 Winchester BAR, .45acp (in a 1911 of ...
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

For OAL, I measure base of brass to tip, with a caliper if I am interested in exacting detail.

IMO, unless you are trying to make 1 very small ragged hole out of a number of shots, a few thousandths is of minimal concern.

90% of my loading is hunting ammo, virtually my only target ammo is handgun. Most of my .308 Win. loads are in GI machine gun brass, which I actually weight into 2-grain variation lots, and keep together (center weight, +-1). I also, since I do not load hundreds at a time, I hand-weigh every charge, to as exact to the weight as my beam scale skills will allow. I also trim every case, before weighing, to length. I get good, sub MOA loads I can count on, but, once I set the seating die to length, I do not go back and caliper every load. IMO a few thou in my ammo, is not enough variation at the end to worry about.
I also use a separate taper crimp die, not the crimp part of the seating die.

My .308 is a BAR, tends to stretch the brass a tad, and WILL NOT go fully into battery if the brass is too long, I have to full-resize and I trim, every single loading, to insure reliability. I could probably trim every other, but, I don't.

Most bolt actions will let you neck-size only, which cuts stretch, and trimming, down a decent ammount.



 Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 12:55 AM
   PM  Quote  Reply 
4th Post
TnTom
member


Joined: Sat Oct 24th, 2009
Location: Woodbury, Tennessee USA
Posts: 72
Photo: 
Are you a handloader?: Yes
Favorite type of cartridge to load?: none
My favorite chambering is:: any
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

OldStuffer wrote: For OAL, I measure base of brass to tip, with a caliper if I am interested in exacting detail.

IMO, unless you are trying to make 1 very small ragged hole out of a number of shots, a few thousandths is of minimal concern.

90% of my loading is hunting ammo, virtually my only target ammo is handgun. Most of my .308 Win. loads are in GI machine gun brass, which I actually weight into 2-grain variation lots, and keep together (center weight, +-1). I also, since I do not load hundreds at a time, I hand-weigh every charge, to as exact to the weight as my beam scale skills will allow. I also trim every case, before weighing, to length. I get good, sub MOA loads I can count on, but, once I set the seating die to length, I do not go back and caliper every load. IMO a few thou in my ammo, is not enough variation at the end to worry about.
I also use a separate taper crimp die, not the crimp part of the seating die.

My .308 is a BAR, tends to stretch the brass a tad, and WILL NOT go fully into battery if the brass is too long, I have to full-resize and I trim, every single loading, to insure reliability. I could probably trim every other, but, I don't.

Most bolt actions will let you neck-size only, which cuts stretch, and trimming, down a decent ammount.
I shoot mostly target. 600 yd hp and similar events.
What surprised me was how much deviation I saw when measuring for example Sierra MK 77gr bthp measuring base to tip then base to tangent pt. There was .007" min to max within a sample of 10. The measurement was repeatable. I guess thats when I began thinking about trimming meplat.
That was base to tip. The base to tangent was .0006" min to max

Last edited on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 12:57 AM by TnTom



____________________
Don't accept the promise of security as a substitute for freedom.


 Current time is 03:40 AM
The Handloaders Bench > Metallic cartridge reloading > Learning to Handload? > Measuring variation in overall all length
Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1760 seconds (19% database + 81% PHP). 27 queries executed.